the US Republicans sense libertarian danger

I mentioned, a couple of stories ago, that Ann Coulter is a Republican
front operation, telling the Drooling end of the market how to vote.

She says "Ron Paul is the antichrist", essentially.

Now, I'm not a Ron Paul fan (and I don't vote in the US anyway) , but he certainly
is a breath of fresh air, i.e. not visibly corrupt.

Anyway, I can now see the campaign is mounting to get rid of Paul

Time Magazine is getting in on it.
I rest my case.
I didn't add it, below, but one talking theme was the pull-back from wars that Paul wants.
So, he's getting an audience and talking about stopping war, so who's behind all
the Republican screaming? MIC?

There's no other reason for them to be bleating so early.
Therefore, you can now see how the media (Ann Coulter and Time) is being
controlled by the powers. It sure looks like it, doesn't it?

checkitout: from Daily Bell
Time Magazine Attacks Ron Paul Conservatives
Monday, June 20, 2011 – by Staff Report

Conservatives used to be the ones with heads firmly based in reality. Their reforms were powerful because they used the market, streamlined government and empowered individuals. Their effects were large-scale and important: think of the reform of the tax code in the 1980s, for example, which was spearheaded by conservatives. Today conservatives shy away from the sensible ideas of the Bowles-Simpson commission on deficit reduction because those ideas are too deeply rooted in, well, reality. – Time Magazine

Dominant Social Theme: Leviathan cannot provide prosperity for all and you better not forget it.

Free-Market Analysis: This article, written by CNN correspondent and CFR member Fareed Zakaria provides us with a good idea of the arguments that the Anglosphere elites are trying to use against the growing Internet Reformation. This sociopolitical and economic movement is one that likely cannot be stopped but the elites will do their best to slow it down and further manipulate it if they can.

The article is apparently based on the recent Republican presidential debates that no doubt frightened elite apologists. In the years since the last set of debates, the libertarian ideas of Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex) have gained considerable ground.

Much of the recent presidential debate turned on foreign policy and the idea that US imperial overreach was not feasible anymore. These were arguments that Paul was making four years ago and they were not well received by other Republican candidates. Today they have resonance. Ron Paul is making them again, with even more power and vigor.

Ann Coulter: Bell weather or bell end?

if you recall, I added Ann to the Miss Republican contest a few months back.

Lots more people are gonna see how stupid she is because of increased coverage
of the other 'contestants', Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman.

Anyway, Ann made the news in March when she said that 'radiation is good for you'.

I interpreted that as meaning that it's on its way, and it's bad for everybody,
except for Ann and her friends who have shares in US healthcare insurers,
who will refuse to treat radiation sickness because

'it's good if people glow'.

So, although she talks bollocks, if you

take the inverse and backwards version of her message,

you catch an important Republican media meme.

I'll go one step further. She works for the Republican party by translating their message

into 'Drooling Idiot-speak', a recognised dialect in the US.

Thought of another way, she is speaking Republican dog-whistle type talk.
The message is received by those backwards-ass Republicans who understand the world as either

'mine' or 'a piece of sh*t',

and hates the government,
unless they can make money off it.

I happen to be a linguist, so that's how I figured it out.
Methodology: listen to the AC message, and watch Republican reaction. That's it.

Here's her latest meme, on Republican Pres Candidate Ron Paul (in Daily Bell):
".. So Rep. Paul is a swashbuckling individualist when it comes to civilization's most crucial building block for raising children, but willing to be a run-of-the-mill government statist when it comes to the Ponzi-scheme entitlements bankrupting the country. He's like a vegetarian who says, "I'm not a fanatic – I still eat meat." "
[Daily Bell commentary] We have read this excerpt several times and we're still not sure we understand it. She asks a lot of questions about children and wills and health care and makes it clear that if government does not handle these issues, then the world will fall into mass confusion. Why should this be so?
Ms. Coulter has spent decades dissecting government incompetence with her rapier wit [Daily Bell's sarcastic wit- Cos67]. Yet in this article, she makes the case that government is absolutely necessary for life's basic relationships. She even makes the case that if state governments don't keep track of marriages then adoption will become unfeasible along with custody and child support issues.
---end

So, 1 the Daily Bell is guilty of using logic to analyse the words of an idiot.
2 The message is 'hey Republicans. Watch out for Ron Paul. He's not one of us'
3 This means that Ron Paul is a threat, either for the Republican nomination, because
he's picking up some "Tea Party themes" (like spending, and shutting the Federal Reserve)
which will mean that Coulter's friends will lose money. SHE's into the Ponzi stuff, not Ron Paul, regardless of what she says above. And even if Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination because of spy subterfuge, he could run as an Independent and screw the Republican candidate, and possibly beat him in the polls, giving the win to Obama.
4 She uses an emotive issue of family, and in so doing, behaves like the government is important to people's lives. That's treading in dangerous territory for a Republican. However, Republican rubes will only hear

'my family is threatened by Ron Paul, who's probably gay'.

5 my main point: Ann Coulter is stupid, but crazy like a fox.


-Cos67 ¬(%^D>
note:
bell end (British slang)= idiot. etymology? see 'phallus', as in 'the fat end of...'